I bet everyone would like an answer to that question. And, at the surface, it does appear to be a simple question. But when you begin to examine it more closely, it really isn't simple at all!
What do we mean by "leading" in the first place? Leading by what measures or indicators. If we are thinking about total healthcare spending, the US spends significantly more in real dollars - of course, just consider the population size. But if we examine percentage bases, and consider, for example, a percentage of GNP (Gross National Product - a standard macro economic measure), then the US continues to out-spend Canada ... and the rest of the world for that matter - being close to 15-16% with Canada and most G8 countries falling under 10%. That means that the US spends roughly 50% more money per capita than anyone else on the globe.
But what do we get for that extra spending? Is the US system performing better than all of these other industrialized countries? How do we measure this performance?
And therein lies the trouble - how do we in fact measure who is doing best? If I want to bet on a baseball or hockey game, I can find out the odds based on past performances or current team records in the league (like the won-lost stats or winning percentage). I can then make a choice on a bet based on these odds. If I want to place an investment on a stock, I would research and find some of the most secure but best performing common shares in recent years and months! But in healthcare, where do I go to find the best doctor at doing hip replacement? Where do I find the best doctor period? Hell, where do I just find a doctor?
These are the questions that must be answered and we are NO where near answering them. The medical profession does not have a long history of accountability (except to themselves) and so getting the outcome statistics will be very difficult. If we are to manage our own healthcare effectively, however, then this information is vital.
In 2004, Washington established the Office of the National Health Care Information Technology (IT) Coordinator with the first top executive being David J. Brailer. Although no longer in the job, he established a clear objective of having an interoperable comprehensive EHR (Electronic Health Record) for every person in the US that wants one by 2014 (ten years out).
Will he be right? I am not sure but I do know that there is a lot of work to be done. In addition, the objectives need to stream out from there. Having an interoperable EHR is only the beginning of the tools that patients will need to navigate through the healthcare system of the future. We will need more information (such as data on the rating of doctors and hospitals) as well as decision support tools to aid us in making the best decision for us.
All this work must start now...we have to be angry and militant about this philosphy. Consider our name ... Patient Destiny - it was meant to be bold and distinctive. Another initiative, started by Steve Case (from AOL), has begun and it's called Revolution Health - different initiative but just as bold a moniker and just as strong a commitment! We are not alone! But we each must help to play our part!!
Let's roll (Hill Street Blues) ... and be careful out there.
